email: whitpresby@mindspring.com
Terrorist Attack Response Help
The unprecedented attack on the United States committed on September 11, 2001 has brought tremendous challenges to our country and society. Among those challenges are the spiritual and religious challenges before us. Here is a collection of material that may provide some guidance or help in this most difficult time.
Afghani-American Perspective
From:
PCUSA NEWS <PCUSA.NEWS@ecunet.org>
Reply-To:
pcusanews@halak.pcusa.org
Note
#6848 from PCUSA NEWS to PRESBYNEWS:
Afghanistan
invasion would play into Osama bin Laden's hands, Afghani-American
writer warns
Terrorist
mastermind seeks a West versus the Muslim world war by
Tamim Ansary
(Editor's
note: This is the first reflection on the Sept. 11 tragedy by an
Afghani-American writer that we've seen. His perspective is utterly
unique. It was sent to the Presbyterian News Service by the Rev. John
Kleinheksel, associate pastor of First Presbyterian Church of Red Bank, N.J. -
Jerry L. )Van Marter
SAN
FRANCISCO - I've been hearing a lot of talk about "bombing Afghanistan back
to the Stone Age." Ronn Owens,
on KGO Talk Radio here today, allowed that
this would mean killing innocent people, people who had nothing to do with this
atrocity, but "we're at war, we have to accept collateral damage.
What else can we do?" Minutes
later I heard some TV pundit discussing whether
we "have the belly to do what must be done."
I thought about the issues being raised especially hard because I am from
Afghanistan, and even though I've lived in the United States for 35 years I've
never lost track of what's going on there. So
I want to tell anyone who will listen how it all looks from where I'm
standing.
I speak as one who hates the Taliban and Osama bin Laden.
There is no
doubt in my mind that these people were responsible for the atrocity in New
York. I agree that something must
be done about those monsters. But
the Taliban and bin Laden are not Afghanistan. They're not even the
government of Afghanistan. The
Taliban are a cult of ignorant psychotics who
took over Afghanistan in 1997.
Bin Laden is a political criminal with a plan.
When you think Taliban,
think Nazis. When you think bin
Laden, think Hitler. And when you
think "the people
of Afghanistan" think "the Jews in the concentration
camps."
It's not only that the Afghan people had nothing to do with this atrocity.
They were the first victims of the perpetrators. They
would exult if someone would come in there, take out the Taliban
and clear out the rats nest of international thugs holed up in their
country.
Some say, why don't the Afghans rise up and overthrow the Taliban? The
answer is, they're starved, exhausted, hurt, incapacitated, suffering.
A few
years ago, the United Nations estimated that there are 500,000 disabled orphans
in Afghanistan - a country with no economy, no food. There are millions
of widows. And the Taliban has been
burying these widows alive in mass
graves. The soil is littered with
land mines, the farms were all destroyed
by the Soviets. These are a few of the reasons why the Afghan people have not
overthrown the Taliban.
We come now to the question of bombing Afghanistan back to the Stone Age.
Trouble is,
that's been done. The Soviets took care of it already.
Make the Afghans suffer? They're already suffering.
Level
their houses? Done.
Turn their schools into piles of rubble? Done.
Eradicate their hospitals? Done.
Destroy
their infrastructure? Cut them off
from medicine and health care?
Too late. Someone already
did all that.
New bombs would only stir the rubble of earlier bombs. Would
they at least get the Taliban? Not
likely. In today's Afghanistan,
only the Taliban eat, only they have the means to move around.
They'd slip away
and hide. Maybe the bombs would get
some of those disabled orphans - they
don't move too fast and they don't even have wheelchairs. But
flying over Kabul and dropping bombs wouldn't really be a strike against
the criminals who did this horrific thing.
Actually it would only be
making common cause with the Taliban - by raping once again the people they've
been raping all this time.
So what else is there? What
can be done, then? Let me now speak
with true
fear and trembling.
The only way to get bin Laden is to go in there with ground troops.
When people
speak of "having the belly to do what needs to be done," they're
thinking in terms of having the belly to kill as many as needed.
Having the belly
to overcome any moral qualms about killing innocent people. Let's
pull our heads out of the sand. What's
actually on the table is
Americans dying. And not just
because some Americans would die fighting their
way through Afghanistan to bin Laden's hideout.
It's much bigger than that folks. Because
to get any troops to Afghanistan,
we'd have to go through Pakistan. Would
they let us? Not likely.
The conquest of Pakistan would have to be first. Will
other Muslim nations just stand by? You
see where I'm going. We're
flirting with a world war between Islam and the West.
And guess what: that's bin Laden's program.
That's exactly what he wants.
That's why he did this. Read his
speeches and statements. It's all
right there.
He really believes Islam would beat the west. It
might seem ridiculous, but he figures if he can polarize the world into Islam
and the West, he's got a billion soldiers.
If the west wreaks a holocaust
in those lands, that's a billion people with nothing left to lose, that's even
better from bin Laden's point of view.
He's probably wrong. In the end the west would win, whatever that would
mean, but the war would last for years and millions would die, not just theirs
but ours. Who
has the belly for that? bin Laden
does. Anyone else?